Agentic AI Systems

By Aishwarya Srinivasan|5/19/2025

AI is evolving from passive responders into proactive agents that can perceive, reason, and act autonomously. We’re witnessing the rise of agentic systems - AI that goes beyond generating text responses to planning, executing, and learning across complex, multi-step tasks.

Unlike traditional models, which respond to prompts or follow hardcoded scripts, agentic AI systems possess a sense of initiative. They can independently interpret goals, decide next actions, and iteratively refine their behavior over time. The result? AI that behaves less like a static program and more like a self-directed assistant or collaborator.

This transformation isn’t theoretical. Today’s agents can book meetings, debug code, orchestrate workflows, and even collaborate with other agents - all with minimal human intervention. It’s a shift that promises not just increased productivity, but a fundamentally different way to build software.

What Are Agentic AI Systems?

At the core, agentic AI systems are defined by “agency”, the capacity to make decisions and act on goals independently. While typical AI is reactive (input in, output out), agentic systems are persistent, iterative, and strategic.

Imagine asking an agent to organize a team offsite. A reactive system might return a checklist. An agentic system would search for venues, cross-check team calendars, send invites, and draft the agenda, adapting its actions along the way.

These systems rely on a combination of memory, planning, and reasoning, often powered by large language models (LLMs), to navigate ambiguity and make real-time decisions. In advanced cases, agents can even prioritize subgoals dynamically as they work toward broader objectives. While today’s agents still operate under human-defined boundaries, they represent a leap forward in autonomy and generalization.

Agentic Design Pattern:

The RTPM Framework (Reflection, Tool-use, Planning, Multi-Agent)

To understand how the AI agentic architecture looks, let’s use Andrew Ng’s systems-level perspective that centers on four essential components: Reflection, Tool-Use, Planning, and Multi-Agent Frameworks. Together, these pillars form the operational backbone for agents capable of autonomy, adaptability, and collaboration.

1. Reflection

Reflection is what distinguishes reactive scripts from adaptive agents. After every action or decision, an agent must evaluate:

• Was the goal achieved?
• Did the tool return the expected output?
• Is the current plan still valid?

This self-critique loop (often powered by internal scoring, reasoning chains, or critic models) enables agents to revise strategies, correct mistakes, and improve over time. It mirrors how humans learn, not just by doing, but by thinking about what they did.

Reflection transforms a sequence of actions into an iterative, learning process, ensuring that the agent becomes more effective with each cycle.

2. Tool-Use

Modern agents are not closed systems, they interact with the world by invoking tools and APIs. Tool-use involves:

• Calling external functions (e.g., code execution, web search, retrieval systems)
• Fetching data or triggering downstream workflows
• Integrating structured outputs (JSON, SQL, etc.) into ongoing reasoning

Tool-use bridges cognition with capability. Rather than relying on internal reasoning alone, agents delegate concrete tasks to external systems—making them more grounded, reliable, and production-ready.

3. Planning

Effective agents don’t just react; they strategize. Planning involves:

• Decomposing high-level goals into subtasks
• Sequencing those subtasks with dependencies and priority
• Reactively adjusting plans when outcomes deviate from expectations

This often requires persistent memory, task queues, and dynamic re-prioritization. Whether through chain-of-thought reasoning or structured execution graphs, planning gives agents the ability to handle complexity over time, not just in the moment.

4. Multi-Agent Framework

Single-agent systems can hit a ceiling. In more advanced applications, agents must collaborate, coordinate, and specialize. Multi-agent frameworks enable:

• Specialized agents (e.g., a planner, a coder, a validator) to work in parallel
• Communication via protocols like MCP or agent-to-agent messaging
• Shared memory or message buses for context exchange

This is where division of labor meets AI - teams of agents working asynchronously or synchronously to solve composite problems that exceed the capabilities of any one agent.

Together, these four components: Reflection, Tool-Use, Planning, and Multi-Agent Collaboration, define a modern, scalable foundation for building intelligent, real-world AI systems.

They enable agents that don’t just complete tasks, but learn, adapt, and cooperate over time.

Key Enablers of Agentic Systems

Agentic AI has become feasible thanks to a convergence of technological advances:

LLM Tool Use

Inspired by the ReAct framework, modern LLMs can now invoke APIs, tools, and functions via structured outputs (e.g. JSON). OpenAI’s function calling and similar mechanisms across platforms let models trigger real-world operations, turning passive chatbots into decision-making agents.

Open-Source Models & Multimodal Models

Open models like LLaMA 2, Qwen, and DeepSeek, let developers build fully custom agents with memory, planning loops, and tool integrations, without relying on proprietary APIs. Agents are becoming multimodal. With vision, audio, and even video inputs, agents can now interpret charts, navigate web UIs, or process spoken commands-enabling richer, real-world tasks.

Structured Outputs & Autonomy Controllers

Orchestration frameworks wrap LLMs in control loops: Plan → Act → Observe → Repeat. These controllers ensure reliability, manage feedback, and handle edge cases. Structured outputs like JSON schemas make execution predictable and automatable.

Long Context Windows & External Memory

LLMs with 100k+ token contexts (e.g. Qwen 3, DeepSeek R1) and ones with 1M tokens like Llama 4 Maverick,  let agents handle massive inputs. When context limits are hit, agents use retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) to query external vector stores-giving them long-term memory.

Fast, Low-Latency Inference

Speed is crucial. Tools like Fireworks AI provide high-performance model serving infrastructure, reducing latency and boosting throughput-allowing agents to operate responsively even across complex workflows.

Building an Agent: A Simple Execution Loop

At its core, an agent’s operation often follows this loop:

1. Plan (LLM generates next step)
2. Act (Execute the step via tool/API)
3. Store (Update memory with result)
4. Evaluate (Check if goal is met, loop again if not)

Practical Applications & Strategy for Adoption

Agentic systems are not a theoretical abstraction, they are being deployed to solve real business problems across key verticals, often in ways that were infeasible with traditional automation. Their ability to sequence multi-step workflows, coordinate external tools, and reason dynamically makes them ideal for high-complexity, high-leverage tasks. Examples include:

• DevOps: Agents can do far more than monitor logs. They continuously ingest telemetry data, detect anomalies using unsupervised learning models, correlate symptoms across distributed systems, and take autonomous remediation steps, such as restarting services or rolling back faulty deployments. Integrated with CI/CD pipelines, these agents can even enforce release gating policies or simulate canary rollouts based on real-time feedback.
• Marketing: Agentic systems can ingest campaign briefs, perform sentiment analysis across past efforts, and optimize message variants based on real-time A/B test results. A single agent might span marketing automation tools (like HubSpot or Salesforce), write human-quality email copy, and decide audience splits based on predictive analytics, removing the need for manual hand-offs between analysts, designers, and coordinators.
• Enterprise Operations: These agents go beyond basic RPA bots by operating across fuzzy, cross-system workflows. For instance, they can extract structured data from invoices, reconcile it against ERP line items, flag inconsistencies using learned heuristics, update accounting entries, and email vendors, while logging each step in a traceable audit trail. They don’t just run scripts, they reason through dynamic exceptions.
• Customer Experience: Rather than relying on flowchart-style chatbots, agentic systems can handle true multi-turn logic with systems access. A CX agent can read ticket history, understand user intent, fetch user-specific order data, and autonomously complete actions like order changes, refunds, or returns. It learns from edge-case escalations and improves resolution quality over time.
• Sales & RevOps: An agent can serve as a full-cycle assistant, researching prospects, enriching lead data from public sources, tailoring outbound messages based on persona insights, updating CRM systems, and even auto-booking meetings via calendar sync. It reasons about buyer readiness, flags opportunities for upsell, and drafts custom proposals by stitching together past win templates.
• Knowledge Work Automation: Tools like Manus AI are pioneering browser-native agentic interfaces that automate complex workflows across web-based tools. For example, Manus can simulate a virtual analyst that logs into your analytics platform, downloads reports, compares trends across weeks, and synthesizes a narrative summary - completing a task that typically requires multiple human interactions and decision points. This showcases how agentic interfaces can bridge reasoning with real-world interfaces, operating as persistent copilots in browser environments.

From an executive lens, this shift signals a new design paradigm: AI isn’t a narrow enhancer of existing UX flows, it can act as an autonomous backend process manager that drives end-user outcomes.

Hitchhikers Guide to AI Agent Implementation:

Strategic Implementation Path for AI Leaders:

1. Start small, but design for scale: Identify a narrow task with deterministic entry/exit points. For example, "triage and escalate support tickets with defined SLAs." Use this to validate reasoning loops, memory handling, and system feedback.
2. Select performant infrastructure: Latency matters. Use optimized inference platforms (e.g. Fireworks AI) that support high-concurrency, low-latency model execution, especially for multi-agent chains. Fireworks AI offers an inference engine optimized not just for speed, but also for quality and cost-efficiency-critical dimensions when deploying agents at production scale. It also provides an AI SDK that gives developers robust customization controls, making it easy to define model routing logic, manage tool chains, and deploy both proprietary and open-source GenAI models with minimal friction.
3. Incorporate vector-based memory: Extend working memory using retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) connected to internal knowledge bases. Define memory scope, expiration, and update frequency.
4. Define tools and governance: Map agent-accessible functions clearly. Use protocol-level safeguards (e.g. MCP scopes) to restrict tool use, enforce logging, and inject policy-based interventions.
5. Run in supervised mode initially: Gate certain actions behind human approval. Use this to train a reward model or critique engine for future autonomous runs.
6. Measure performance beyond accuracy: Track task completion time, number of iterations, fallback rates to human escalation, and satisfaction metrics.
7. Adopt modular design patterns: Structure agents as reusable components, for example, an "email composition agent" could be reused across sales, support, and marketing workflows.

Leaders who operationalize agentic systems early will develop an advantage not just in productivity, but in architectural agility. The move from scripts to cognition-enabled agents mirrors the shift from static workflows to intelligent process orchestration - a foundational evolution in enterprise software design.

Final Thoughts💡

Agentic AI systems are more than an evolution of chatbots, they're a redefinition of software. Systems that think, act, and collaborate are not years away, they’re being deployed now.

By combining memory, planning, reasoning, and tool use, agents represent a modular, composable architecture for intelligent automation. For ML engineers and AI leaders, the opportunity is clear: build early, build responsibly, and build with a mindset focused on autonomy, not just assistance.

If you want to prototype and scale agentic workflows efficiently, with support for high-speed inference, flexible model hosting, and built-in orchestration, you can start building on Fireworks AI. Our SDK streamlines the agent development lifecycle with developer-first primitives, optimized to deliver quality, speed, and cost-efficiency at scale.

In the upcoming post, we’ll dive deeper into browser-native agents, systems that can literally click, scroll, and navigate like a human across the web. It’s one of many use cases where agentic AI begins to feel less like a feature, and more like a co-pilot.

We are entering an era where objectives, not just queries, are delegated to AI, and where software becomes a partner, not just a tool.